Q&A with E. Chai Vasarhelyi and Jimmy Chin

The following questions and answers are excerpted from a conversation that followed the NBR screening of The Rescue.

This story is incredibly dramatic on its face. What were the underlying themes that most resonated with you?

E. Chai Vasarhelyi: I think it’s important to remember how divided the world was in 2018. And here’s a story about people who came together — irregardless of national boarders, languages, politics — to save twelve children and a coach that no one has ever met before. And that idea of our common humanity uniting us (be it as parents, as children, or simply as people who are interested in doing the right thing) was really moving to both Jimmy and myself. It felt like one of those stories that was important, and was in some way even more important than even the rescue itself. Sharing the story, and reminding us all of what we have in common, was really important.

Jimmy Chin: I think we are always looking for the subtext, and stories that — as Chai just said — transcend the subjects and the event. But, that being said, there were also a lot of very tantalizing layers to it! You know, these unlikely heroes, the tension, and frankly it seemed like a huge challenge to make the film. And I think Chai and I like challenges! In terms of the ideas behind these last three films we’ve made, they are about human potential, in some bigger sense. About the potential to be your best selves… the potential to elevate who you are in these high-stakes moments. And in some ways we found a lot of similarities between the subject of our previous film and these divers who live these incredible lives and shape them entirely around cave diving. It’s a lifestyle, it’s not even a sport, really. They are devoted to the craft, and the craft requires perfection. And the stakes are extraordinarily high. So there was that part that really drew us in as well.

if we could all rise to the occasion to be our best selves, we’d be in a very different place

Can you talk about your filmmaking process?

ECV: I think we both agree that with nonfiction films, the magic is in the obstacles. Because unlike in narrative or fiction films, you can’t “write yourself out” of a problem. We hold ourselves to journalistic standards. So the constraints become opportunities to innovate or refine your craft. And this film had every constraint: if you were allowed to film in the cave, it’s pitch-black. If you filmed underwater, it was super muddy. No civilians were allowed to film within the cave. There was really no known footage of the cave itself; the British divers, as you can see in the movie, actively avoided the cameras of the press. There was a rights situation where the children and their families were not open to being filmed. And it was a pandemic. And it’s in Thailand, half way across the world. So long story short, there’s no footage. We had this very unusual position where we had an amazing story but no footage— unlike many documentaries that have tons of footage and no story! It just became a task about how to work around those limitations. And I think our reenactments just had to happen, which we realized early on. Because how do you allow people to understand what these British divers did under the circumstances?

JC: I mean, it was either animations, or recreations, you know? And I think that it was just about bringing audiences into the moment— the way that we put it together was that we wanted the divers (and we brought all the divers together) to really demonstrate how they did it. Down to the minute details. And so really it was a hugely informative experience with them, just to see them preparing to do what they do. Because even if you’re filming in a tank in a studio, it’s still diving. You still can’t make mistakes. And just to see the details: there’s a brief shot in the film of Jason swimming with five tanks. And it’s just a brief shot. But that’s the kind of task they have to do, and that’s accurate to what they did. How they swam, how they had to transport tanks… it’s already hugely complicated and difficult, and Jason’s down there swimming with all of this gear… All the details and the authenticity of what you’re seeing in the film is because they demonstrated for us exactly what happened.

How did you balance the various perspectives of the event?

JC: I think we really wanted to show what happened, you know? These details are all true to the events. One of the challenges I think about the story is that it is such a fractured perspective, in terms of… you know, the Thai Navy Seals were managing the rescue sight. The divers had their intentions. The water workers had their mission. And so everybody that was involved all had the best intentions, but you know… when you go on a complicated rescue sight (and I’ve been on some, on location), it can be extraordinarily chaotic. One of the main things that is focused on during those situations is making sure that the rescuers themselves don’t put themselves in danger. Because then you’re just adding victims. So that’s the reality of a situation like that. If you’re managing a rescue sight, and two random guys show up and are like, “excuse me, excuse me… we’re going to go in there…” you know, it gets kind of sketchy. We wanted to show the balance of what the challenges were, what it actually looked like, and present it so that people could feel and see all these different perspectives.

ECV: Just to add to that: we were very much drawn to being true to the essence of the story, and the essence of the story is that people from all walks of life — different languages, special forces, volunteers, Americans, Thais, Chinese, Australians — all came together, in spite of the challenges, to achieve the impossible. And if we all could do that, if we could all rise to the occasion to be our best selves, we’d be in a very different place. So that’s why it was our imperative, our moral imperative, just to compliment what they did, to try to include all those different points of view.

Q&A with Alex Honnold, Jimmy Chin, and Elizabeth Chai Vasarhelyi

The following questions and answers are excerpted from a conversation that followed the NBR screening of Free Solo.

Was the El Capitan free solo climb always the thing, or were you interested in Alex more generally?
Elizabeth Chai Vasarhelyi: We were interested in Alex and interested in his process and interested in who he is as a human. Originally, we didn’t know about the El Cap project. Alex brought that to the table.

Jimmy Chin: When Alex told us that he wanted to free solo El Cap, we actually took a step back for several months and had to answer some hard questions for ourselves about whether or not this was the type of film we were ready to take on. For the obvious reason of risk, but also questions about how to do it and if that was even okay.

ECV: And, also how the filming, itself, affects your subject. We knew that we would be in it together. That was the thing for me.

“I felt like I was fully committed to this process no matter what.”

Can you talk about portraying Alex as a complex character, not just as a high-risk climber in the film?
ECV: Well, the character portrait was really important to us. We were interested in making a film that had depth, because the climb means more than just the climb. Hopefully, the film raises questions about what’s a meaningful life, and what are we doing with our lives. How do we confront our own fears? So, we were interested in those big questions, and the only way we could get to it was through the human character part of it. And, Alex is really interesting and very candid. He allowed us this wonderful access to be there while he prepared. When we first began shooting, Alex was internet dating. So, it was like we’re going to make a comedy. We thought it would be funny, and then he tells us about El Cap. Then he meets this wonderful woman, Sanni, who is just articulate emotionally. She’s got the self-confidence and self awareness and love for him to be able to push back and interact in ways that make Alex grow. So, as a documentary filmmaker that was a real opportunity. Also, the way that the crew was interacting with Alex was a huge part of this.

Alex, you’ve interacted with a lot of film crews. How was this experience similar of different from ones that you’ve had?
Alex Honnold: I mean it was similar in some ways, because the high angle filming was basically what I’ve done in the past but at a higher level. We all just spent more time on the wall making sure we were getting it. Because, over the two years that I was preparing to free solo El Cap, they were up there filming my preparation. So, basically we were all practicing what it is to be on the wall and shoot well. For me the huge difference was shooting the rest of my life. I’m used to shooting on the wall. As a professional climber that’s the day-to-day, in a way. But, to have someone in the van watching the relationship with my girlfriend was different. One of the things that I found kind of challenging was that we’d spend the whole day up on the wall preparing. You spend maybe eight hours physically toiling with the camera guy next to you. Then you get to the ground, and you’re like, “Now, it’s time to chill.” But, then a verité film crew picks you up and they’re like, “Okay, we’re all friends! Let’s go!” I was so pooped. Please just turn it off for a little while. But, I think that’s why the film does such a good job showing my real life, because that’s two years of my life right there. That’s it.

What was it like for you to watch it?
AH: It’s heinous. I think I saw it for the first time in this screening room. I was having flashbacks.

JC: Tell both sides.

AH: I have the opposite experience from the average audience I think. I watch the whole first hour of the film with my relationship with Sanni covering my face. Because, it’s hard to watch yourself. But, the actual climbing it’s like, “this is freaking glorious.” That is what I can do well. I’m bumbling my way through relationships and everything else. But, the climbing… I’m like, “that’s good.”

Jimmy, can you talk about working with your crew on the wall?
JC: Yes, the task really began in picking the team. We had an incredible team of really professional climbers that were also incredible cinematographers. That’s a very rare combination to have at the upper echelon. They have to be completely one hundred percent trustworthy as high end climbers. You should never have to worry about whether or not they’re going to make good decisions or if you trust them on the wall or if they can move quickly and handle all the stresses of being a climber. So, the discussion is always that you’re a climber first. And, then they are filming on top of it. There’s a handful of people in the world that can do it. It turns out, of course, that climbing is a small community on the upper echelon. So, we all have been friends with Alex, have climbed with Alex, several of them had been his climbing partners. It felt very intimate on top of everything else, and just an incredible crew.

AH: In a lot of ways it made it easier for me to do my preparations, because a lot of the people that I was shooting with were the same people that I would have been up there with anyway just on the wall. You see a shot in the film of me and Mikey, the guy that’s covering his eyes all the time.

ECV: The cinematographer who can’t watch.

AH: The two of us are rappelling down the wall together, and we were doing that day in day out. We would rappel down the whole face, all three thousand feet together, so that I could work on some specific part of the climb. He would film it, and then we would just keep going towards the ground. And, that’s pretty much what we would have been doing anyway. It was perfect. I’m up here with my friends, we’re working on my project, and they’re making a great film about it. It’s all very ideal for me.

ECV: That sounds very nice, but there was this other side to it. Everyone was so close that there was this special circle of trust that developed. Everyone was carrying the risk and living with the weight for those years. There was a commitment that was very special with the team.

How close were any of you to not going through with this film?
AH: I always wanted to free solo El Cap, and so whether the film existed or not I would have been working toward that goal. In some ways having the film involved made it easier to work on it just because I had people to talk to about it. so, I felt like I was fully committed to this process no matter what. Even if the filming was challenging sometimes like trying to have a conversation with my girlfriend with somebody in the van with us. Ultimately, I was like I’m still going down this path regardless.

ECV: I personally think the camera in the van is great couples counseling.

AH: In some ways it is though! It stresses the relationship in certain ways. We definitely grew faster than you would otherwise. Some people can date for a year by just going on the casual date a couple times a week. For us dating the first year was us living in a car together with somebody watching us talking about our feelings all the time. It’s a pretty intense way to start a relationship.

ECV: The question does get to the existential part of the film which is the risk involved. How could we participate or enable something like this? I think the answer always comes back to the core message of the film which is the idea of a life well lived. This is what Alex was dreaming to do, and this is the life he chose. Our job was really to not mess it up. Not on our watch, and that was hard. That was the ethical debate that happened every day. We tried our best as filmmakers to insulate Alex from it while still having a lively discussion with him about his comfort zones. It was intense. We’re really happy he made it.

When you’re on a wall that size is there improvisation at any point?
AH: There is a fair amount of easy climbing on El Cap. So, all the stuff that I’m narrating are the hardest sections of the wall. But, there are easy sections of the wall. So, some of those I didn’t necessarily know every single hand and foot placement, because you just don’t need to. It’s like walking on the sidewalk or something. Or if the sidewalk was pitched back or something. There’s some improvisation, but I had climbed the route many times. So, it’s not totally improv, because I’ve done it before. I just didn’t have it perfectly memorized.

Alex, can you talk about your foundation a bit more?
AH: So, I started the Honnold Foundation about five years ago, and it’s sort of been steadily growing over time. This year I hired a full time Executive Director who has really taken it forward. We basically support solar for a more equitable world, trying to make the world a better place through solar projects. We’ve sort of split our time domestically and abroad. We’ve supported maybe three or four different projects in Africa and then a bunch of support for this group, GRID Alternatives, domestically. So, I’ve done installations with them in California. Basically, I’ve just been using the foundation as a vehicle to support projects around the world. Part of them stemmed from going on climbing expeditions with Jimmy. We went on a trip together to Chad in 2009, and it was one of my first times seeing that level of need in the world. Combine that with the fact that I was living in a van, and I had a very low overhead. I was very happy with my life making more than I need, but there was so much other need in the world. The foundation was a way to try to address that.